PUBLISHED SKILL / v1.5
PR Release Gatekeeper
Review your press release before you publish.
An AI skill that reviews your press-release draft against the organizational facts, messaging and editorial guidance you provide, highlighting what needs correction or confirmation.
The Skill runs in a compatible tool, not on this website. The publication decision remains yours.
INSTALL COMMAND
npx skills add othmansunbul-cpu/ai-skills --skill pr-release-gatekeeperFrom draft and references to a clear finding
Fictional illustration, not an actual run result.
Press-release draft
The communications workshop takes place on 12 October.
User-supplied references
Fact sheet
Communications workshop date: 14 October.
Illustrative editorial note
Workshop date mismatch
The draft says 12 October; the fact sheet says 14 October. Confirm the approved date before publishing.
Source: supplied fact sheet.
BRINGA press-release draft and available relevant sources. A full review needs at least one usable supporting source.
RECEIVEOrganized findings, their evidence, and items for human review.
Begin in three steps
- Install the Skill in a compatible tool on your computer.
- In one message, attach your press-release draft and any available supporting documents, such as a messaging pack, editorial guide or fact sheet, and ask the assistant to use the skill.
- Read findings and evidence references before deciding to publish.
Installation needs Node.js and npm. The bundled validator needs Python 3 and jsonschema 4.26.0. Installing files alone does not prove a review works.
Requirements and first use
The example below starts with Codex on Windows, one possible tool. Use the signs at each step to see what has worked on your computer; your setup may differ.
- On a Windows computer, open the ChatGPT desktop app, sign in, select Codex, and open a folder for this work. Keep your draft and approved references in a place Codex is allowed to read.
- In the app's integrated PowerShell terminal, check that Node.js/npm and Python 3 are available. The Skill's Python dependency is jsonschema 4.26.0, listed in its requirements.txt; arrange for it in the Python environment that will run the validator.
- In the integrated PowerShell terminal, from the folder where you want project-level Skills, paste the command below. Follow the installer's prompts, choosing Codex and the intended project when offered.
A successful install, readable files, a working Python validator and a sound professional review are four separate checks. This website cannot verify your own setup or run the review.
Codex setup · Node.js · Python
Review scope
Full Gate Review
Full Gate Review checks publication readiness across the available draft and supporting material. It needs a readable draft and at least one usable supporting source. An eligible result can include a gate decision, prioritized findings, evidence references, limits and items for human review.
Focused Review
Focused Review addresses a stated question, such as factual integrity, message alignment or style. It stays within that scope and does not issue a full publication-readiness decision.
The Skill uses supplied, accessible material. It does not search the open web on its own or automatically rewrite the release. A person with authority checks the evidence and makes the publication decision.
Limitations and responsibility
The review depends on the quality, relevance and accessibility of what you supply. It cannot establish facts from material it has not received, guarantee safe publication, or replace the judgment of an authorized person. Read the published limitations, including the note on bilingual quotations.
The Skill does not research the web or rewrite the release automatically. The public document explains both known limitations, including bilingual quotations.
Read known limitationsIf installation or validation stalls
If the source or destination looks unfamiliar, stop and check the public repository and the selected folder. If the command fails, read its error before retrying; do not use elevated permissions as a default fix.
If validation did not run, the result lacks sources, or the question exceeds the supplied evidence, treat it as incomplete. Add authorized material or seek human review; do not publish on that basis.
Product guide